It does not take a casual observer much effort to realize that many people who have an anti-religion agenda deliberately misinterpret American history. Thus, factual historical facts are simply “erased” to fit an ideology. This is an unfortunate practice of revisionist history as it is not an accurate approach to updating our known history with new facts.
There is a debate between two separate ideologies. The first ideology is the most accepted belief of American history, which believes that Christianity played no role in shaping the U.S. government. The second doctrine, commonly accepted among Christians, insist on teaching “traditional” history to their children.
The linchpin causing such debate around “traditional” history is that Christianity played a significant role in shaping the U.S. government and morals of the colonies and eventually young nation.
This is not an attempt to say that all the founders were devout followers of the Christian God or if they even believed in Him. It is not our right to judge the “walks” of our founders with God, but it is outright to defend what they did through their lives.
There are anti-religion quotes that revisionist’s find and use to argue that the founders were not Christian. Thus, as a result, the U.S. is not a Christian nation.
The founders surely made statements that were critical of organized religion, but there is overwhelming evidence that almost all the founders believed in the Christian God and were members of established churches. Thus, it is not hard to believe that the founders used the principles of the Bible played help create the U.S. government and moral society
There is always a danger in history being interpreted with a broad brush of political activism today to fit an intellectual idea. Thus, it becomes important to dig deep into topics yourself and believe that history is best told by those that lived it and wrote about it. Considering this is the U.S. a nation under God or a nation not under God?
The Court affirmed the religious nature of the U.S. This could be seen in an opinion delivered by Justice David Josiah Brewer on the behalf of the Court that unanimously agreed. He stated the following:
[t]here is no dissonance in these declarations. There is a universal language pervading them all, having one meaning; they affirm and reaffirm that this is a religious nation. These are not individual sayings, declarations of private persons: they are organic [legal, governmental] utterances; they speak the voice of the entire people. … These, and many other matters which might be noticed, add a volume of unofficial declarations to the mass of organic utterances that this is a Christian nation.
The decision by the Supreme Court did not merely say that a majority of the American people were Christian, or that there were no Muslims, Hindus or other religious sects in America. Rather, Justice Brewer claimed it was the court’s unanimous opinion that America is a Christian nation in “the domain of official action and recognition, [but not in regards to] individual acceptance.”
The Court’s decision demonstrates that our entire system of government was created with a responsibility to recognize the authority of the Christian God. Also, those who acknowledged the Christian God’s authority and committed to obeying His commandments intended the government they created to recognize and obey God.
This decision is astonishing considering the nation’s rejection of Christianity’s role in its founding and government. As a result, it certainly is intriguing to consider how do we got from Supreme Court opinion to the doctrine of “separation of church and state.”
The “Church of the Holy Trinity v. U.S.” case was overruled in 1931. As a result, the idea that the government was “under God” was replaced with “separate” from God.
The doctrine of “separation of church and state” encompasses more than churches as it infers the Separation of God and Government.
In 1989, the Supreme Court declared in its decision for “Allegheny County v. Greater Pittsburgh ACLU “the Constitution mandates that the government remains secular.”
This is certainly a far stretch from any truth.
There is no piece of the Constitution that does or does not establish the U.S. government to ignore God’s authority.
The Case involving the Church of the Holy Trinity shows four points:
- Each American colony was considered a Christian Theocracy from its earliest founding in the 1600’s.
- The colonies had a universal agreement that the formation of a civil government was a Biblical obligation – all the governments were Theocratic. The colonists formed governments with the belief that God commanded them to assemble them. Thus, the founding of a government was considered a religious act.
- The federal government established under the U.S. Constitution were Christian Theocracies.
- The ratification of the U.S. Constitution would never have occurred if the federal government had been given authority to prevent the U.S. from being “under God” and officially and legally acknowledging that they – the founders and colonies (States) – to be under His jurisdiction.
[t]he general principles on which the fathers achieved independence were the general principles of Christianity. I will avow that I then believed, and now believe, that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God.
He also said in a letter to the officers of the First Brigade, the Third Division of the Militia of Massachusetts that “[o]ur Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people.
God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are of the Gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath? Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that His justice cannot sleep forever; That a revolution of the wheel of fortune, a change of situation, is among possible events; that it may become probable by Supernatural influence! The Almighty has no attribute which can take side with us in that event.
It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions, but on the gospel of Jesus Christ. For this very reason peoples of other faiths have been afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship here.
I considered leaving concluding remarks to encompass my interpretation of these observations, but I believe the best approach is to allow you to interpret what has been presented for yourself.
I hope you will take the time to dive into the history of this matter and voice what you find here for discussion.